Jamshed Haneef | Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | Innovative Research Award

Innovative Research Award

Jamshed Haneef
Jamia Hamdard

Jamshed Haneef
Affiliation Jamia Hamdard
Country India
Scopus ID 55675642900
Documents 36
Citations 566
h-index 14
Subject Area Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
Event International Invention Awards
ORCID 0000-0002-5520-6466

Jamshed Haneef is a researcher affiliated with Jamia Hamdard, India, whose supplied bibliometric profile identifies toxicology as the subject area. The reported Scopus record includes 36 documents, 566 citations and an h-index of 14. These indicators provide a quantitative overview of the publication and citation record associated with the identified author profile. The Innovative Research Award provides a recognition framework for examining research originality, methodological quality, scientific contributions and potential applications. This article presents the supplied profile information and discusses relevant considerations for evaluating research achievements without assuming unverified award decisions or attributing specific inventions to the researcher. [1]

Abstract

This article presents a research-profile overview of Jamshed Haneef, affiliated with Jamia Hamdard, India, with toxicology identified as the principal subject area in the supplied information. The reported Scopus metrics comprise 36 documents, 566 citations and an h-index of 14. These measures describe aspects of scholarly productivity and citation visibility but do not independently establish research quality, originality or practical impact. The profile is considered in the context of the Innovative Research Award associated with the International Invention Awards. Assessment of research distinction requires examination of verified publications, individual contributions, methodological rigor, innovation evidence and potential societal relevance. [1] [2]

Keywords

Jamshed Haneef; Innovative Research Award; International Invention Awards; Jamia Hamdard; India; toxicology; research evaluation; bibliometrics; scientific publications; citation analysis; h-index; research innovation; scholarly impact; research assessment.[1]

Introduction

Research recognition can help communicate scientific achievements and draw attention to work with potential value for academic or practical applications. In toxicology, research may address the effects of chemical, biological or environmental agents on living systems, including mechanisms of toxicity, exposure assessment and risk evaluation. Evaluating a researcher’s contributions requires consideration of the relevance and reliability of the underlying studies, alongside publication and citation information. [3]

Research Profile

Jamshed Haneef is listed in the supplied profile data as affiliated with Jamia Hamdard in India. The stated subject area is toxicology, a field concerned with the adverse effects of substances and the scientific assessment of exposure-related risks. The reported bibliometric indicators are 36 documents, 566 citations and an h-index of 14. The Scopus author identifier and ORCID supplied for this profile provide starting points for checking identity and publication records. [1] [4]

Research Contributions

Research contributions in toxicology may include identifying mechanisms of toxicity, characterizing hazardous exposures, evaluating biological responses and developing methods that improve safety assessment. Such work can support scientific understanding and inform decisions in areas including environmental health, pharmaceutical development and chemical risk management. The relevance of any contribution should be established through the researcher’s actual publications, study designs and documented findings rather than inferred solely from a subject-area label. [3]

Publications

The supplied Scopus profile reports 36 documents associated with the author identifier 55675642900. This count offers a broad indication of indexed scholarly output, but a complete publication review would need to establish the document types, publication dates, subject relevance and authorship details. A verified bibliography should be checked against the original publisher records and the researcher’s persistent identifiers to reduce the risk of author-name ambiguity.[5]

Research Impact

The reported 566 citations indicate that documents associated with the supplied profile have received scholarly citations within the relevant indexing record. The h-index of 14 represents a combined measure of publication output and citation distribution under the standard definition: at least 14 indexed publications have each received at least 14 citations, assuming the supplied metrics are accurate and refer to the same author record. These values can help describe scholarly visibility but may vary by database, coverage and retrieval date. [2]

Award Suitability

The Innovative Research Award, presented here in the context of the International Invention Awards, can be assessed through evidence of originality, research rigor, individual contribution and the potential value of the work. The reported publication and citation indicators offer useful background information, but award suitability cannot be established from bibliometric metrics alone. A fair evaluation would examine the candidate’s actual research outputs, the significance of the findings and the strength of supporting evidence.[5]

Conclusion

The supplied profile describes Jamshed Haneef as affiliated with Jamia Hamdard, India, and identifies toxicology as the subject area. It reports 36 documents, 566 citations and an h-index of 14 under the specified Scopus author identifier. These indicators provide a starting point for understanding the research record, but a comprehensive evaluation should also consider the content, rigor, originality and practical significance of individual contributions. Any formal recognition associated with the Innovative Research Award should be supported by verified award records and primary research documentation.[1]

References

  1. Elsevier. (n.d.). Scopus author details: Jamshed Haneef, Author ID 55675642900.
    https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=55675642900
  2. Journal article. (2023). Structural insights into mechanical anisotropy in ambrisentan polymorphs.
    https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ce00483j
  3. Journal article. (2022). Investigation of a Minocycline-Loaded Nanoemulgel for the Treatment of Acne Rosacea.
    https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics14112322
  4. ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID record: 0000-0002-5520-6466.
    https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5520-6466
  5. International Invention Awards. (2026.). Official award website.
    https://inventionawards.org/

Rupa Mazumder | Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | Best Researcher Award

Best Researcher Award

Rupa Mazumder
Noida Institute of Engineering And Technology

Rupa Mazumder
Affiliation Noida Institute of Engineering And Technology
Country India
Scopus ID 7005832705
Documents 211
Citations 1,412
h-index 18
Subject Area Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
Event International Invention Awards
ORCID 0000-0002-1888-548X

Rupa Mazumder is a researcher affiliated with the Noida Institute of Engineering And Technology, India, whose documented scholarly profile is associated with toxicology and pharmaceutical science. The supplied Scopus record reports 211 documents, 1,412 citations, and an h-index of 18, providing a bibliometric basis for considering the researcher within an academic recognition framework. [1]

Abstract

Rupa Mazumder is an India-based researcher affiliated with the Noida Institute of Engineering And Technology and associated with the subject area of Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science. The supplied bibliometric profile records 211 scholarly documents, 1,412 citations, and an h-index of 18. These indicators provide measurable evidence of sustained research activity and scholarly visibility. Her profile is considered in relation to the Best Researcher Award under the International Invention Awards framework. Assessment of researcher recognition may consider publication productivity, citation influence, research continuity, subject expertise, and the broader relevance of scientific contributions. Bibliometric information should be interpreted alongside verified qualitative evidence and individual research outputs for balanced academic evaluation.

Keywords

Rupa Mazumder; Best Researcher Award; Toxicology; Pharmaceutical Science; Drug Research; Pharmacology; Research Impact; Scholarly Publications; Citation Analysis; h-index; Scientific Research; International Invention Awards.

Introduction

Researcher recognition in pharmaceutical and toxicological sciences commonly involves consideration of scholarly productivity, research quality, citation performance, and sustained engagement with scientific questions. Bibliometric indicators can provide a structured quantitative perspective, although they do not independently establish the originality or practical significance of individual studies. The available profile for Rupa Mazumder presents a substantial publication and citation record that can be examined as part of a broader academic assessment. [1] Standardized researcher identifiers such as Scopus Author ID and ORCID can also assist in distinguishing scholarly outputs and improving the reliability of attribution. [2]

Research Profile

The supplied profile identifies Rupa Mazumder with the Noida Institute of Engineering And Technology in India and places the research activity within Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science. The reported Scopus Author ID is 7005832705, while the associated ORCID is 0000-0002-1888-548X. These persistent identifiers provide complementary mechanisms for connecting scholarly records with an individual researcher and can support verification across academic databases. [1] [2]

Research Contributions

Within toxicology and pharmaceutical science, research contributions may encompass the investigation of drug effects, safety, pharmacological mechanisms, toxicological responses, therapeutic development, and related biomedical questions. The available information does not provide a complete thematic inventory of Rupa Mazumder’s individual studies, so specific scientific claims should be based on verified publication records rather than inferred solely from bibliometric indicators. The documented publication volume nevertheless indicates sustained participation in scholarly research. [1]

Publications

The supplied Scopus information records 211 documents associated with the researcher profile. Publication counts are useful for describing research productivity but should be evaluated with attention to document type, authorship, journal quality, research field, chronology, and subject relevance. A complete publication assessment would require examination of the underlying indexed records and individual bibliographic metadata. The reported document count is therefore presented as a profile-level bibliometric indicator rather than as an independent measure of research quality. [1]

Research Impact

The supplied profile reports 1,412 citations and an h-index of 18. Citation indicators can help describe the visibility and scholarly uptake of published research, while the h-index combines productivity and citation dimensions into a single metric. Such measures vary across disciplines, career stages, database coverage, and publication practices and should therefore be interpreted within appropriate academic context. [1] Citation-based assessment is strongest when complemented by qualitative evidence concerning originality, methodological contribution, collaboration, and influence on subsequent research.

Award Suitability

The available bibliometric information provides a relevant quantitative foundation for consideration for the Best Researcher Award. The combination of 211 reported documents, 1,412 citations, and an h-index of 18 indicates an established scholarly record within the supplied profile. [1] Final award suitability should, however, be determined through verification of the researcher identity, publication record, research quality, originality, professional contributions, and alignment with the applicable award criteria. The profile therefore supports consideration without implying that bibliometric measures alone determine award outcome.

Conclusion

Rupa Mazumder’s supplied academic profile documents substantial scholarly activity in the field of Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science, with 211 documents, 1,412 citations, and an h-index of 18. These indicators establish a useful quantitative basis for academic recognition while requiring contextual interpretation. [1] Verification through persistent researcher identifiers, indexed publications, and qualitative evidence can strengthen the assessment. On the information provided, the profile presents a credible basis for consideration under the Best Researcher Award category of the International Invention Awards.

References

  1. Elsevier. (n.d.). Scopus author details: Rupa Mazumder, Author ID 7005832705. Scopus.
    https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=7005832705
  2. ORCID. (n.d.). ORCID record: Rupa Mazumder, ORCID 0000-0002-1888-548X. ORCID.
    https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1888-548X
  3. Journal article. (2026).Preparations, Applications, Patents, and Marketed Formulations of Nanoemulsions – A Comprehensive Review.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/0122117385325186240912110731
  4. Journal article. (2025). A Comprehensive Investigation on the Role of Bioactives on DYRK1A to Avert Alzheimer’s Disease.
    https://doi.org/10.18311/jnr/2025/49903
  5. International Invention Awards. (2026. ). Official award website.
    https://inventionawards.org/